There’s a very tight lid on communications from Harry and David. I don’t know what’s going on inside, but here are some things I do know:
1. According to media reports, two lawsuits have been filed against Harry and David.
- The first was filed by Drew Reifenberger, Executive Vice President and Chief Customer Officer, who was fired by then-CEO Steven Heyer in January. The basis of the lawsuit? Termination without cause and lack of contractually required payments.
- The second suit, claiming almost $10 million, was filed last week by Convergys Customer Management Group (CCMG). According to the suit, Harry and David and CCMG signed a 2-year contract which required CCMG to provide call center services and to hire an additional 25 full-time personnel during that period. CCMG is requesting payments due under the contract.
2. On February 18th, Harry and David announced the hiring of Kay Hong as “Chief Restructuring Officer and CEO.”
3. Harry and David is hiring. Careerbuilder.com shows 14 jobs that have been posted since Kay Hong was hired. Positions advertised include store managers, Controller, Director of Online Marketing, Director of Market Research, and Manager of Website User Insights. Nothing in the ads indicates that this is a “turnaround” situation.
What is the significance of all of the above?
With regard to the lawsuits
1. When the contract was signed with CCMG in August, did Harry and David’s CEO and upper management realize that Harry and David’s situation was precarious? If so, was it ethical to enter into an agreement it might never be able to honor? Was it wise? If Harry and David’s CEO and board did NOT realize that the situation was precarious, they certainly should have. Any competent turnaround CEO would have known that, but, of course, Wasserstein hired Heyer, who was not, in fact, a turnaround expert.
2. Who signed the contract with CCMG? Was it Heyer, or was it Reifenberger? If it was Heyer, it raises questions about his experience, wisdom, and ethics. If it was Reifenberger, is that part of the reason his employment was terminated? Again, however, responsibility lies with Heyer and the board. One of the first groundrules established by an experienced turnaround CEO is that material contracts require his/her sign off.
3. Is the company not paying CCMG and Reifenberger because it is conserving cash so it can successfully navigate a planned Chapter 11?
With regard to “Chief Restructuring Officer and CEO”—In my experience the title CRO is used primarily in a bankruptcy situation, so the title suggests that the company expected to file Chapter 11 at the time Hong was hired.
Hiring: If you follow my blog, you know that my assessment is that poor quality control coupled with poor customer service have contributed to the problems facing the company, so I am happy to see that they MAY finally be focusing on the customer experience. One caveat, however: when I advertise for positions in turnaround situation, I usually try to let applicants know right away about the situation facing the company. Some people love a challenge. Those are the people I am looking for. I have met many people, however, who have been recruited into troubled situations in which the executives have failed to disclose the company’s situation. Shame on the companies!
On a different note: Perhaps the recruiting is a signal that management believes that Harry and David can, in fact, survive.